In this paper the author gives a brief account of the life and composing of John Newton, with a specific focus on his hymns and the Olney Hymnal.
In this paper, the author briefly sketches the Arian controversy and the arguments used in favour of Arianism. After comparing Arianism with the Jehovah’s Witnesses, the author then seeks to address their most compelling arguments.
The author provides a brief sketch of some aspects of Puritan spirituality and pastoral theology.
In this paper, the author surveys the major positions concerning the heresy against which Paul wrote his letter to the Colossians. It is concluded that the data is best explained by the existence of a general syncretistic belief that mixes Judaism, Christianity, and Hellenism. The paper concludes with a brief reflection on mirror reading and how the conclusions reached in this paper should lead to a reconsideration of the the role of mirror-reading over against historical reconstruction.
In this paper, the relationship between Habakkuk and its greater context as part of the Book of the Twelve is considered in brief. Different positions are not interacted with at length, but a few arguments in favour are offered, as are a few words against the opposition. Lastly, brief insights this context provides for our reading of Habakkuk are given. Attached is a helpful bibliography of relevant published essays and books.
In this paper, it is argued that in Romans 1:17 Paul uses “the righteousness of God” to refer to God’s righteous character displayed in salvation accomplished by the provision of righteousness through Christ’s life, death, and resurrection for those who believe. Each of these three aspects is considered and argued for, the most space being spent defending the righteousness of God as the provision of imputed righteousness.
Paul’s use of Deuteronomy 30:11-14 in Romans 10:1-8 has puzzled many an interpreter. This paper builds on previous work on Deuteronomy 30 to explain the text of Romans 10:1-8 and particularly Paul’s use of Deuteronomy 30.
An application to our time of Paul’s message in his early epistles to those struggling with license and legalism.
In this paper, the author looks at Jeremiah 34:17-22 in its literary context to better understand the passage and why the author of Jeremiah has put it in its present place. Particular attention is paid to the maledictory oath in 34:18-19.
For some , Josh 10 and similar accounts present an immense ethical dilemma–how can God commission and participate in such a slaughter? Yet, our answer to such a dilemma presupposes that we understand the texts that raise it; have we? Many argue we have not, that they communicate no such thing. They argue that what we have are hyperbolic victory accounts communicating no more than complete victory–not necessarily utter destruction. The contention of this paper is that Joshua 10:28-43 is not hyperbolic but records with striking emphasis the fulfillment of God’s HRM (to devote to destruction) commands in Deuteronomy as regards a specific section of southern Canaan. (Contains as an appendix a word study on HRM [Herem].)
In this paper, the author provides a literary reading of 2 Samuel 11:27-12:25, arguing that the author of 1 & 2 Samuel carefully crafts his narrative to demonstrate God’s faithfulness to His promises and David’s true repentance, with the result that God would still provide David with a sure house and victory over his enemies.
I consider the translation of Hab. 2:2c in light of the semantic range and uses of διωκω (to pursue, to run) and αναγινωκσω (to read) and in light of the MT. The conclusion drawn is that the LXX text is best translated in accord with the MT, “so that the one reading the things will run.”
In this paper, it is argued that Paul teaches imputed righteousness in Romans and that this doctrine has its roots in the Biblical storyline invoked by Paul in the introduction of the letter. Genesis 15:6 is discussed as the primary Old Testament text that anticipates imputation, but Habakkuk 2:4 is referenced as an essential step in the progressive revelation of the doctrine.
Exegesis and application of Philippians 2:12-18
Following the theological method of Lewis and Demarest in their Integrative Theology, this paper is an attempt at a Historical, Biblical, Systematic, Apologetic, and Practical theology of Hell. (Written for towards a Bachelor’s in Pastoral Leadership)
“He became man, that we might become God;” is this new age pantheism or Christian Orthodoxy? This quote captures in a shocking manner a central theological tenant in the thought of the early church father Athanasius. The purpose of this paper is to answer the question, what did Athanasius mean with his doctrine of deification, and what influence should it have on Protestant Christian theology.
Is the Free Will Defense the best Christianity has to answer the Problem of Evil. This paper is an attempt at deconstructive apologetics, weeding out those arguments that are less than helpful for the orthodox Christian. It is an attempt to show that the Free Will Defence rests on the shaky assumption of Libertarian Free Will, and should not be used by Christian Apologists.
Sacramental Ontology… What is it, and should it matter? While this paper may not explicitly answer this latter question, it is an attempt to define Sacramental Ontology and critique it on the basis of it’s appeal to platonic philosophy and Church history.
An analysis of self-esteem counselling in light of the Christian anthropology.